Author Topic: DRAFT Proposed TGIF Rules for review.  (Read 806 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline WB3IHY

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 67
  • Location: Northeast Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Referrals: 0
    • QRZ Profile
Re: DRAFT Proposed TGIF Rules for review.
« on: November 17, 2019, 02:04:28 pm »
General comments:

Overall, everything looks good.  A fine job of codifying what most of us would agree to be in the spirit of TGIF.  Although the spelling/grammar stickler in me might want a few minor corrections before it becomes "official" (Examples: "Any interference whether intentional," "This includes bridges: They...").

Discussion regarding rule #3:

We may want to consider wording to handle situations where someone requests a talkgroup but later abandons/has no interest in administrating/moderating it.  What happens? Should there be a procedure where someone can request/petition for those roles?

Also, might we want to add the requirement that the WIKI page for each talkgroup specifically state the current administrator/moderator for that talkgroup along with the requirements of rule #6?

Thanks for reading!

73,
Joe, WB3IHY
« Last Edit: November 17, 2019, 02:20:51 pm by WB3IHY »

 

Related Topics